<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Blockbuster closing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openambition.com/2009/07/09/a-blockbuster-closing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openambition.com/2009/07/09/a-blockbuster-closing/</link>
	<description>The juncture of success and meaningful failure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter U</title>
		<link>http://openambition.com/2009/07/09/a-blockbuster-closing/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meaningfulfailure.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/a-blockbuster-closing/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I have been similary shocked at how busy that red machine is and never thought about it until I read your Blog.

I think this also points to an interesting problem with the current model of service in business today as well.  That a machine that provides no service, other than reserving and dispensing (cheaply), can easily compete with a store that usually had 2 or 3 employees theoretically &quot;serving&quot; the customers.

In actuality though, the human beings in the Blockbuster provided no service.  If I had a movie request, the employee was unresponsive because they had no interest and possibly no means to bring in a particularl movie into the store.  If I had a movie question, they had no knowledge of movies (other than being able to review Spring Break Daytona sequal #24).  They also never had resources to look up information such as a movie review book or possibly a computer console set up with useful movie resources that the customer could use.

I once asked at this same Blockbuster if they had the original movie M.A.S.H. and the employee had no clue what I was talking about or that an original movie existed.  I wouldn&#039;t necessarily expect a 19-year-old university student to have seen an old movie such as this, but I might expect if I was going into a store that&#039;s entire reason for existance is to rent movies to have employees who had a knowledge, interest, and possibly even a passion for movies.

Will Barnes and Knobles eventually just become an automated Red Box?  Will urgent care centers soon dispense a diagnosis and medication prescription from an automated Red Box?  

Interestingly, our local hospital has a machine very similar to the Redbox DVD machine for dispensing common Emergency Room medication prescriptions - pretty much everything is automated . . . as a pharmacist, I see this as poor medical service for the customer - poor medication counseling, inadequate checking for drug interactions and appropriateness of drug and dose for the patient, but it does serve the needs of the customer in a way that the current health care model cannot (we don&#039;t have many available 24-hour pharmacies, or certainly not convenient ones).

All very interesting stuff.

thanks for the blog post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been similary shocked at how busy that red machine is and never thought about it until I read your Blog.</p>
<p>I think this also points to an interesting problem with the current model of service in business today as well.  That a machine that provides no service, other than reserving and dispensing (cheaply), can easily compete with a store that usually had 2 or 3 employees theoretically &#8220;serving&#8221; the customers.</p>
<p>In actuality though, the human beings in the Blockbuster provided no service.  If I had a movie request, the employee was unresponsive because they had no interest and possibly no means to bring in a particularl movie into the store.  If I had a movie question, they had no knowledge of movies (other than being able to review Spring Break Daytona sequal #24).  They also never had resources to look up information such as a movie review book or possibly a computer console set up with useful movie resources that the customer could use.</p>
<p>I once asked at this same Blockbuster if they had the original movie M.A.S.H. and the employee had no clue what I was talking about or that an original movie existed.  I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily expect a 19-year-old university student to have seen an old movie such as this, but I might expect if I was going into a store that&#8217;s entire reason for existance is to rent movies to have employees who had a knowledge, interest, and possibly even a passion for movies.</p>
<p>Will Barnes and Knobles eventually just become an automated Red Box?  Will urgent care centers soon dispense a diagnosis and medication prescription from an automated Red Box?  </p>
<p>Interestingly, our local hospital has a machine very similar to the Redbox DVD machine for dispensing common Emergency Room medication prescriptions &#8211; pretty much everything is automated . . . as a pharmacist, I see this as poor medical service for the customer &#8211; poor medication counseling, inadequate checking for drug interactions and appropriateness of drug and dose for the patient, but it does serve the needs of the customer in a way that the current health care model cannot (we don&#8217;t have many available 24-hour pharmacies, or certainly not convenient ones).</p>
<p>All very interesting stuff.</p>
<p>thanks for the blog post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
